| Programme of EventsMembershipPublicationsEditorial BoardOfficers | Library |
| Hampshire Field Club & Archaeological Society |
| Registered Charity number 243773 | HomepageArchaeologyHistoric Buildings LandscapeLocal History |
Newsletter 44 - Autumn 2005 Trade Directories: Developments in Accessing Them Derek Spruce
There is a clearly explained search engine facility that enables searches for directories to be made by decade of publication, location and key word searches initiated by the user. At the most basic level the site aims to provide directories for all geographical areas for the decades of the 1850s, 1890s and 1910s. Interrogation of the site for Hampshire directories shows that there is a much more comprehensive listing for the county, giving 18 directories in all. The Winchester area is especially well covered with six directories, ranging from Gilmour’s of 1854 through to three by Warren dating from 1895 to 1910. The remaining 12 cover the whole county and range in date from 1784 to 1911 with six covering the 20 years from 1851. The section ‘How to Use this Site’ is very helpful and users can print high quality copies using the PDF button. There are advanced retrieval methods that can be used by those wanting to make sophisticated use of the search facilities but basic users can learn a great deal about their localities using the two basic search commands. There are also useful links to seven local and urban history and five military history sites. The ‘History Notes’ provide much useful background information and guidance about the material for local, economic and family historians. It is regrettable that the series has to end in 1919, for the peak year of publication was 1936 when 320 directories were published. Continuation to the start of the Second World War with the inclusion of the 1939 Kelly’s Hampshire Directory would have been a fitting end but readers can view later editions in the Record Office or Local Studies Library whose help in the project is acknowledged by the organizers. It is also a regret that the covering text does not bring to the attention of users the problems of interpretation and analysis that should be borne in mind. Advice about this can be found in M Drake and R Finnegan (eds), Sources and Methods for Family and Community Historians: A Handbook, Cambridge, 1997. |
||||